Jump to content


Photo

We should nuke Iran


  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

#1 Siamak

Siamak

    Αστροναύτη`

  • Members:
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 25,101 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Paris
  • Interests:UFOs,Ducati,Real Madrid,Taj Tehran,Shemiran,Antique Auctions,Politic,Stars

Posted 13 September 2006 - 05:45 PM

By MICHAEL COREN


It is surely obvious now to anybody with even a basic understanding of history, politics and the nature of fascism that something revolutionary has to be done within months -- if not weeks -- if we are to preserve world peace.

Put boldly and simply, we have to drop a nuclear bomb on Iran.

Not, of course, the unleashing of full-scale thermo-nuclear war on the Persian people, but a limited and tactical use of nuclear weapons to destroy Iran's military facilities and its potential nuclear arsenal. It is, sadly, the only response that this repugnant and acutely dangerous political entity will understand.

The tragedy is that innocent people will die. But not many. Iran's missiles and rockets of mass destruction are guarded and maintained by men with the highest of security clearance and thus supportive of the Tehran regime. They are dedicated to war and, thus, will die in war.

Frankly, it would be churlish of the civilized world to deny martyrdom to those who seem so intent on its pursuance. Most important, a limited nuclear attack on Iran will save thousands if not millions of lives.

The spasm of reaction from many will be that this is barbaric and unacceptable. Yet a better response would be to ask if there is any sensible alternative. Diplomacy, kindness and compromise have failed and the Iranian leadership is still obsessed with all-out war against anybody it considers an enemy.

Its motives are beyond question, its capability equally so. It is spending billions of dollars on a whole range of anti-ship, anti-aircraft and anti-personnel missiles, rockets and ballistic weapons:

The Shahab 3ER missile, with a range of more than 2,000 km, and the BM25 and accompanying launchers, which are so powerful that they can hit targets in Europe. Raad missiles with a range of 350km. The Misaq anti-aircraft missile, which can be fired from the shoulder. The Fajar 3 radar-evading missile and the Ajdar underwater missile, which travels at an extraordinarily high speed and is almost impossible to intercept. The Zaltal and the Fatah 110 rocket, the Scud B and Scud C and the BM25 with a range of 3,500 kms.

Iran is also developing enormous propellant ballistic missiles and began a space program almost a decade ago that will enable it to bomb the United States. It is also assumed in intelligence circles that Tehran has Russian Kh55 cruise missiles stolen from Ukraine which are now being copied in large numbers by Iranian scientists.

Comparisons to the Nazis in the 1930s are unfair -- to the Nazis. Hitler had the French army, the largest in Europe, on his border and millions of Soviet infantry just a few hours march away. Iran has no aggressive enemies in the region.

Its fanatical leader, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, controls a brutal police state, finances international terror and provokes bloody wars in foreign countries. It is unimaginably wealthy because of its oil revenues and is committed, in its leader's words, to "rolling back 300 years of Western ascendancy" and wiping another nation, Israel, from the face of the earth.

A conventional attack would be insufficient because Iran and its allies seem only to listen to power and threat. Better limited pain now than universal suffering in five years.

The usual suspects will complain. The post-Christian churches, the Marxists, the fellow travelers and fifth columnists. But then, the same sort of people moaned and condemned in 1938. They were clearly wrong then. They would be just as wrong now.


Posted Image


This Morning, a group of Iranians gathered downtown in front of the Toronto Sun Office to object to an article published on September 2nd by Michael Coren stating “We should nuke Iran”. If an Iranian writer were to use this headline about Canada in Iranian publishing, the world would turn upside down.


crxy.jpg


#2 lolita37

lolita37

    Nice to be back :)

  • Members:
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,633 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:International superstar!

Posted 13 September 2006 - 05:47 PM

somebody should shove a nuke up his Azz!!!! :diablo: :punishing_wft:

#3 pourya

pourya

    pourya@bia2.com

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 48,970 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 September 2006 - 12:07 AM

In this post-cold war era US cant really justify ”nuking” any land without the clear and present threat of being nuked! Its just ranting!

“Everything interests me, but nothing holds me.” — Fernando Pessoa


#4 davoooood

davoooood

    Bia2 Semi Pro

  • Members:
  • PipPip
  • 1,153 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 September 2006 - 12:59 AM

living in toronto, i can let you guys know that the toronto sun is considered to be VERY right wing, they are anti-liberal when it comes to the politics here in canada, so much so that they actually have cartoons on the front page making fun of liberal politicians on a regular basis.

it's one of the big 3 papers in toronto (toronto star, globe & mail, toronto sun).

a lot of editorials in that "newspaper", it's actually more like a tabloid magazine.

it's not surprising in the least that this would come from a writer for the sun, but it sucks for him because there's a large iranian population in toronto, so he's going to be under some heat for this. not only that, but this isn't the united states, there are people here that oppose war against anyone, and they'll be heard.

but it's sad to read that.

Posted Image


#5 Omega

Omega

    Bia2 Pro

  • Admin
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,445 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 September 2006 - 03:25 AM

1) This article became ridiculous as soon as i read the "We should nuke iran" title.

2) His violent overture totally contradicts his so called convictions about the Iranian regime.

3) BUT Lets not be arrogant and ignorant, just because we disagree with the nuke sentiment. He DOES make some VERY relevant points about the potency and aspirations of the REGIME.

4) Someone does need to act VERY QUICKLY, there's no perfect solution, but an uprising of some sort would be best. They can fly to the moon and find Sadam Hussein in a hole so im sure they can create some sort of uprising.

5) I, as im sure with almost all of of us here have alot of family in Iran, so this guys suggestion "The tragedy is that innocent people will die. But not many" infuriates me, suffice to say i'm sure he has no family or indeed friends there, as*hole!

#6 pourya

pourya

    pourya@bia2.com

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 48,970 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 September 2006 - 03:31 AM

"The tragedy is that innocent people will die. But not many"


he must have had Hiroshima in mind!lol

“Everything interests me, but nothing holds me.” — Fernando Pessoa


#7 Michellica

Michellica

    Party Girl

  • Members:
  • PipPipPip
  • 5,761 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:NYC
  • Interests:music,travelling,books,photography,cinema and tv shows.

Posted 14 September 2006 - 07:21 AM

we should nuke the white house.
Posted Image

#8 Omega

Omega

    Bia2 Pro

  • Admin
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,445 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 September 2006 - 08:21 AM

I think the nuclear weapon has got to go down in history as THE worst ever invention and it will be the demise of mankind, people talk of all these theoretical possibilities to bring about the apocalypse, but this weapon will not serve its purpose as a deterrant much longer. Far too many people are acquiring it, especially "unstable" states...

#9 Siamak

Siamak

    Αστροναύτη`

  • Members:
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 25,101 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Paris
  • Interests:UFOs,Ducati,Real Madrid,Taj Tehran,Shemiran,Antique Auctions,Politic,Stars

Posted 14 September 2009 - 06:04 PM

Ann Coulter: Bomb Iran

"Time for preemtive attack on Iran"


crxy.jpg


#10 Siamak

Siamak

    Αστροναύτη`

  • Members:
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 25,101 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Paris
  • Interests:UFOs,Ducati,Real Madrid,Taj Tehran,Shemiran,Antique Auctions,Politic,Stars

Posted 09 January 2010 - 11:00 AM

Military attack "very, very destabilizing"

Pentagon: Nuclear Iran or strike against the country could destabilize Middle East


crxy.jpg


#11 Persiano

Persiano

    Bia2 Trainee

  • Members:
  • PipPip
  • 104 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 09 January 2010 - 03:11 PM

Military attack "very, very destabilizing"

Pentagon: Nuclear Iran or strike against the country could destabilize Middle East

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dd7daUm74OE

thought he said stabilizing, thought he got som issues with iran

#12 Siamak

Siamak

    Αστροναύτη`

  • Members:
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 25,101 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Paris
  • Interests:UFOs,Ducati,Real Madrid,Taj Tehran,Shemiran,Antique Auctions,Politic,Stars

Posted 12 June 2010 - 02:35 AM

'Saudi airspace open for Iran attack'


http://www.jpost.com..._medium=twitter

crxy.jpg





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users